Data pruning based on metadata

ABSTRACT

A system and method for pruning data based on metadata. The method may include receiving a query comprising a plurality of predicates and identifying one or more applicable files comprising database data satisfying at least one of the plurality of predicates. The identifying the one or more applicable files including reading metadata stored in a metadata store that is separate from the database data. The method further includes pruning inapplicable files comprising database data that does not satisfy at least one of the plurality of predicates to create a reduced set of files and reading the reduced set of files to execute the query.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.16/861,516, filed Apr. 29, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 16/688,888, filed Nov. 19, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No.10,678,753, issued Jun. 9, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 16/399,448, filed Apr. 30, 2019, which is acontinuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/210,536, filed Jul.14, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,437,780 issued Oct. 8, 2019, which areincorporated herein by reference in its entirety, including but notlimited to those portions that specifically appear hereinafter, theincorporation by reference being made with the following exception: Inthe event that any portion of the above-referenced application isinconsistent with this application, this application supersedes theabove-referenced application.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates to resource management systems andmethods for the management of data storage and computing resourcesrelated to data management.

BACKGROUND

When working with large volumes of data, there are often situations whenonly a small fraction of data is relevant for a given task. In thosecases, identifying the relevant subset early increases productivity bynot accessing irrelevant data and thereby results in dramaticperformance improvements. Current technologies available in thecomputing industry focus on organizing data in a specific manner inorder to achieve acceptable results. Such technologies rely on primaryindices wherein a table is forced to be ordered on some dimension. Thedownside with this approach, however, is that maintaining strictordering is often expensive and only a single dimension can be used forretrieval in any storage scheme.

Another common technology relies on the use of secondary indices;wherein auxiliary data structures are created that provide quick accessto records that match desired criteria. A shortcoming of such systems isthat they commonly result in random access patterns, are expensive tomaintain with updates, and use additional disk and memory within asystem. Additionally, they require user participation in order to makemanual or semi-automatic decisions about what indices should be created.

Another common technology relies on table partitioning. Using thisapproach, a system may allow explicit partitions along certaindimensions. For example, each week can be formed into a separate subsetof the data, and then filters on the used dimensions may be optimized soas to only access the relevant partitions (i.e., those that contain datafrom relevant ranges). A problem with this approach is that it typicallyonly works with a relatively small number of partitions (10-100s), andrequires manual tuning by an administrator.

Yet another common approach relies on Min-Max indices (also called “zonemaps”) to automatically maintain simple statistics (usually min/maxvalues for all columns) about different dimensions within the data.Based on these statistics relevant ranges of data can be readilyidentified. This is most useful when exploiting the natural order of thedata such as when the data is loaded in batches such that batches havevery little overlap (as is common e.g. for time-based loading). They canalso be used when there is a primary index on the data.

The systems and methods described herein provide an improved approach todata storage and data retrieval that addresses and reduces the impact ofthe above-identified limitations of existing systems by efficientlymanaging the data and data operators being processed within a dataprocessing system.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Non-limiting and non-exhaustive embodiments of the present disclosureare described with reference to the following figures, wherein likereference numerals refer to like parts throughout the various figuresunless otherwise specified.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram depicting an example embodiment of the systemsand methods described herein.

FIGS. 2A, 2B, and 2C illustrate a simplified example of a set of fileshaving metadata consistent with the teachings and disclosures madeherein.

FIG. 3 illustrates a flow chart depicting an implementation of themethods disclosed herein.

FIG. 4 illustrates a block diagram depicting an embodiment of anexecution platform as disclosed herein.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram depicting an example operating environmentwith multiple users accessing multiple databases through multiplevirtual warehouses.

FIG. 6 is a block diagram depicting another example operatingenvironment having multiple distributed virtual warehouses and virtualwarehouse groups.

FIG. 7 is a flow diagram depicting an implementation of a method for themanagement of data storage and retrieval operations.

FIG. 8 is a block diagram depicting an example computing deviceconsistent with the enabling disclosure of the computer processes taughtherein.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the description that follows, methods, systems, and apparatuses forquerying within a computing system will be discussed. For example, animplementation may begin by receiving a query directed to a set offiles. The query may include a plurality of predicates and may alsoinclude a request to delete tuples in the query. The implementation mayfurther include accessing metadata associated with the set of files thatcomprises the data characteristics of the set of files. Additionally,the implementation may further identify zero or more files in the set offiles that do not need to be analyzed for a given query based on themetadata without accessing data in any of the files in the set of files.The implementation may further include identifying each of the pluralityof predicates in the query and comparing each of the identifiedpredicates against the metadata associated with the set of files. Theimplementation may delete or remove zero or more of the predicates ifthey are not represented within the metadata associated with the set offiles to generate a revised or modified query.

In the following description, reference is made to the accompanyingdrawings that form a part thereof, and in which is shown by way ofillustration specific exemplary embodiments in which the disclosure maybe practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail toenable those skilled in the art to practice the concepts disclosedherein, and it is to be understood that modifications to the variousdisclosed embodiments may be made, and other embodiments may beutilized, without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in alimiting sense.

Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment,” “anembodiment,” “one example” or “an example” means that a particularfeature, structure or characteristic described in connection with theembodiment or example is included in at least one embodiment of thepresent disclosure. Thus, appearances of the phrases “in oneembodiment,” “in an embodiment,” “one example” or “an example” invarious places throughout this specification are not necessarily allreferring to the same embodiment or example. In addition, it should beappreciated that the figures provided herewith are for explanationpurposes to persons ordinarily skilled in the art and that the drawingsare not necessarily drawn to scale.

Embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure may be embodied asan apparatus, method or computer program product. Accordingly, thepresent disclosure may take the form of an entirely hardware-comprisedembodiment, an entirely software-comprised embodiment (includingfirmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.) or an embodimentcombining software and hardware aspects that may all generally bereferred to herein as a “circuit,” “module” or “system.” Furthermore,embodiments of the present disclosure may take the form of a computerprogram product embodied in any tangible medium of expression havingcomputer-usable program code embodied in the medium.

Any combination of one or more computer-usable or computer-readablemedia may be utilized. For example, a computer-readable medium mayinclude one or more of a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, arandom access memory (RAM) device, a read-only memory (ROM) device, anerasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory) device, aportable compact disc read-only memory (CDROM), an optical storagedevice, and a magnetic storage device. Computer program code forcarrying out operations of the present disclosure may be written in anycombination of one or more programming languages. Such code may becompiled from source code to computer-readable assembly language ormachine code suitable for the device or computer on which the code willbe executed.

Embodiments may also be implemented in cloud computing environments. Inthis description and the following claims, “cloud computing” may bedefined as a model for enabling ubiquitous, convenient, on-demandnetwork access to a shared pool of configurable computing resources(e.g., networks, servers, storage, applications, and services) that canbe rapidly provisioned via virtualization and released with minimalmanagement effort or service provider interaction and then scaledaccordingly. A cloud model can be composed of various characteristics(e.g., on-demand self-service, broad network access, resource pooling,rapid elasticity, and measured service), service models (e.g., Softwareas a Service (“SaaS”), Platform as a Service (“PaaS”), andInfrastructure as a Service (“IaaS”)), and deployment models (e.g.,private cloud, community cloud, public cloud, and hybrid cloud).

The flow diagrams and block diagrams in the attached figures illustratethe architecture, functionality, and operation of possibleimplementations of systems, methods, and computer program productsaccording to various embodiments of the present disclosure. In thisregard, each block in the flow diagrams or block diagrams may representa module, segment, or portion of code, which comprises one or moreexecutable instructions for implementing the specified logicalfunction(s). It will also be noted that each block of the block diagramsand/or flow diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the block diagramsand/or flow diagrams, may be implemented by special purposehardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts, orcombinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.These computer program instructions may also be stored in acomputer-readable medium that can direct a computer or otherprogrammable data processing apparatus to function in a particularmanner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readablemedium produce an article of manufacture including instruction meanswhich implement the function/act specified in the flow diagram and/orblock diagram block or blocks.

The systems and methods described herein provide a flexible and scalabledata warehouse using a new data processing platform. In someembodiments, the described systems and methods leverage a cloudinfrastructure that supports cloud-based storage resources, computingresources, and the like. Example cloud-based storage resources offersignificant storage capacity available on-demand at a low cost. Further,these cloud-based storage resources may be fault-tolerant and highlyscalable, which can be costly to achieve in private data storagesystems. Example cloud-based computing resources are available on-demandand may be priced based on actual usage levels of the resources.Typically, the cloud infrastructure is dynamically deployed,reconfigured, and decommissioned in a rapid manner.

In the described systems and methods, a data storage system utilizes anSQL (Structured Query Language)-based relational database. However,these systems and methods are applicable to any type of database usingany data storage architecture and using any language to store andretrieve data within the database. The systems and methods describedherein further provide a multi-tenant system that supports isolation ofcomputing resources and data between different customers/clients andbetween different users within the same customer/client.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram depicting an example embodiment of a new dataprocessing platform 100. As shown in FIG. 1, a resource manager 102 iscoupled to multiple users 104, 106, and 108. In particularimplementations, resource manager 102 can support any number of usersdesiring access to data processing platform 100. Users 104-108 mayinclude, for example, end users providing data storage and retrievalqueries and requests, system administrators managing the systems andmethods described herein, software applications that interact with adatabase, and other components/devices that interact with resourcemanager 102. Resource manager 102 provides various services andfunctions that support the operation of all systems and componentswithin data processing platform 100. Resource manager 102 is alsocoupled to metadata 110, which is associated with the entirety of datastored throughout data processing platform 100. Because the resourcemanager 102 is coupled with the metadata 110 corresponding to sets offiles, the metadata 110 may be used for optimizing user queries. In someembodiments, metadata 110 includes a summary of data stored in remotedata storage systems as well as data available from a local cache.Additionally, metadata 110 may include information regarding how data isorganized in the remote data storage systems and the local caches.Metadata 110 allows systems and services to determine whether a piece ofdata needs to be processed without loading or accessing the actual datafrom a storage device.

As part of the data processing platform 100, metadata 110 may becollected when changes are made to the data using data manipulationlanguage (DML), which changes may be made by way of any DML statement.Examples of manipulating data may include, but are not limited to,selecting, updating, changing, merging, and inserting data into tables.As part of the platform 100, files may be created and the metadata 110may be collected on a per file and a per column basis, after which themetadata 110 may be saved in a metadata store. This collection ofmetadata 110 may be performed during data ingestion or the collection ofmetadata 110 may be performed as a separate process after the data isingested or loaded. In an implementation, the metadata 110 may comprisea number of distinct values; a number of null values; and a minimumvalue and a maximum value for each file. In an implementation, themetadata may further comprise string length information and ranges ofcharacters in strings.

Resource manager 102 is further coupled to an execution platform 112,which provides multiple computing resources that execute various datastorage and data retrieval operations, as discussed in greater detailbelow. Execution platform 112 is coupled to multiple data storagedevices 116, 118, and 120 that are part of a storage platform 114.Although three data storage devices 116, 118, and 120 are shown in FIG.1, execution platform 112 is capable of communicating with any number ofdata storage devices. In some embodiments, data storage devices 116,118, and 120 are cloud-based storage devices located in one or moregeographic locations. For example, data storage devices 116, 118, and120 may be part of a public cloud infrastructure or a private cloudinfrastructure, or any other manner of distributed storage system. Datastorage devices 116, 118, and 120 may be hard disk drives (HDDs), solidstate drives (SSDs), storage clusters, or any other data storagetechnology. Additionally, storage platform 114 may include distributedfile systems (such as Hadoop Distributed File Systems (HDFS)), objectstorage systems, and the like.

In particular embodiments, the communication links between resourcemanager 102 and users 104-108, metadata 110, and execution platform 112are implemented via one or more data communication networks and may beassigned various tasks such that user requests can be optimized.Similarly, the communication links between execution platform 112 anddata storage devices 116-120 in storage platform 114 are implemented viaone or more data communication networks. These data communicationnetworks may utilize any communication protocol and any type ofcommunication medium. In some embodiments, the data communicationnetworks are a combination of two or more data communication networks(or sub-networks) coupled to one another. In alternate embodiments,these communication links are implemented using any type ofcommunication medium and any communication protocol.

As shown in FIG. 1, data storage devices 116, 118, and 120 are decoupledfrom the computing resources associated with execution platform 112.This architecture supports dynamic changes to data processing platform100 based on the changing data storage/retrieval needs as well as thechanging needs of the users and systems accessing data processingplatform 100. The support of dynamic changes allows data processingplatform 100 to scale quickly in response to changing demands on thesystems and components within data processing platform 100. Thedecoupling of the computing resources from the data storage devicessupports the storage of large amounts of data without requiring acorresponding large amount of computing resources. Similarly, thisdecoupling of resources supports a significant increase in the computingresources utilized at a particular time without requiring acorresponding increase in the available data storage resources.

Resource manager 102, metadata 110, execution platform 112, and storageplatform 114 are shown in FIG. 1 as individual components. However, eachof resource manager 102, metadata 110, execution platform 112, andstorage platform 114 may be implemented as a distributed system (e.g.,distributed across multiple systems/platforms at multiple geographiclocations). Additionally, each of resource manager 102, metadata 110,execution platform 112, and storage platform 114 can be scaled up ordown (independently of one another) depending on changes to the requestsreceived from users 104-108 and the changing needs of data processingplatform 100. Thus, in the described embodiments, data processingplatform 100 is dynamic and supports regular changes to meet the currentdata processing needs.

With reference primarily to FIGS. 2A, 2B, 2C, and FIG. 3, animplementation for the use of metadata with the processing of fileswithin a relation, or a plurality of relations will be discussed. Itwill be appreciated by those in the computing fields, that metadatacorresponding to a relation being processed may be used for derivingoptimized values during the execution of operational processes, such asfiltering and/or joins, which will greatly improve data management onlarge scales. FIG. 2A illustrates an example of a file that is namedFILE1 and consists of name and date information. As can be seen in thefigure, FILE1 comprises metadata 220 a that describes the contents ofthe actual data 222 a in the file primarily in the form of data rangesexpressed in the file.

FIG. 2B illustrates an example of a file that is named FILE2 andconsists of name and date information. As can be seen in the figure,FILE2 comprises metadata 220 b that describes the contents of the actualdata 222 b in the file primarily in the form of data ranges expressed inthe file.

FIG. 2C illustrates an example of a file that is named FILE3 andconsists of name and date information. As can be seen in the figure,FILE3 comprises metadata 220 c that describes the contents of the actualdata 222 c in the file primarily in the form of data ranges expressed inthe file.

It will be appreciated that in an implementation, files may be used fordata storage and metadata extraction. In an implementation, fixed-sizedor variable-sized data segments within files may also be used. It willbe appreciated that the metadata 220 a, 220 b, 220 c may be derived whenloading the data, and stored both with the data, for example in thefile, and/or in a separate metadata store.

During use, method 300 of FIG. 3 may receive a query directed to a setof files at 310, and wherein the query may comprise a plurality ofpredicates. In an implementation, each set of files may havecorresponding metadata therewith that may be accessed by a processor at320. It will be appreciated that file metadata, including disk block,chunk of data may be created, for example, automatically upon loadingdata into a system, or it may be created manually on command of a user,or it may even be a part of the files from the beginning (i.e., somefile formats already have it).

It will be appreciated that the following metadata properties may beidentified typically during the step of loading data into a system orduring a separate optimization stage. At 331, representative values foreach file within the set of files may be derived from the metadata. At333, the number of null values may be derived from the metadata for eachfile within the set of files. At 335, maximum and minimum values may beread or derived from the metadata associated with each file in the setof files, thereby establishing a range of values that is representativeof the data in the set of files. It will be appreciated that afterperforming the processes of 320, 331, 333, and 335, a large amount ofinformation is known about each file within the set of files withoutactually accessing any of the files individually. At 340, a plurality ofpredicates may be identified from the query and then compared to themetadata associated with each of the files within the set of files.

At 350, the method 300 comprises determining the following for each filein a set of files and for each of the plurality of the predicates: ifany, some, or all data in that file match a given or at least onepredicate based on the file metadata. Specific examples of the differingtypes of metadata will be discussed in greater detail below inconnection with FIGS. 2A-2C.

At 360, the method 300 comprises removing files that do not match agiven predicate from the set of files. At 370, the method 300 comprisesdetermining for each of the plurality of the predicates whether any ofthe analyzed files do not fully match a predicate, and if not, thepredicate is removed from the query. At 380, the method 300 comprisesdetermining the final set of files that should be used for furtherprocessing.

In an implementation, the method may comprise creating one or more filescomprising the metadata. In an implementation, the method may furthercomprise collecting the metadata when there are changes made to the dataon a per column and a per file basis during data ingestion or as aseparate process after data is loaded. In an implementation, the methodmay further comprise receiving the metadata on a per column and a perfile basis and storing the metadata in a metadata store.

In an implementation, the metadata of the set of files may be comparedagainst the plurality of predicates supplied with the query. In theimplementation, if the predicates are not satisfied by the metadata, ordo not fall within a range defined by the metadata, then the set offiles can be ignored. Alternatively, if the predicates are not satisfiedby the metadata of any set of files, then the predicate may be removedfrom the query.

For example, if the metadata reveals that all values in all files in acolumn “X” are greater than 7, a filtering process “WHERE X>7” may beremoved, thereby saving computing resources because the actual files orparts of files need not be processed. Additionally, if it is known thatthere are no null values in a set of files, the filter “IS NOT NULL” maybe removed, thereby saving resources. In another implementation, it maybe known that the column values are all within a range from 0 . . .1000, a 2-byte physical representation of that column may be used tosimplify all the expressions regarding data from that column.

In an implementation, columns in a file may be identified that do notneed to be accessed during query processing if they are only used inpredicates that have been deleted. For example, in implementation wherethe system only reads a subset of columns/attributes when processing aquery, if a predicate is eliminated from the query, it is possible thata given column was only used by this predicate, and not by any otherpart of the query. In that case, this column does not need to beaccessed and the expression does not need to be processed during thequery execution. Consider the following in relation to the example inFIGS. 2A-2C:

1) In the case where: SELECT NAME . . . WHERE YEAR(birthday)>1970, thereare only fully matched files with this predicate, hence the predicatecan be eliminated.2) In the case where: SELECT NAME YEAR(birthday)>1980 AND SUBSTR(name,1, 1)>‘K’

YEAR(birthday)>1980, matches metadata

FILE1: partially

FILE2: completely

FILE3: nothing

SUBSTR(name, 1, 1)>‘K’, matches metadata

FILE1: nothing

FILE2: partially

FILE3: was already eliminated by the first predicate

In this case, FILE1 is eliminated by the second predicate, and onlyFILE2 is in the set of files to be scanned, then the first predicateYEAR(birthday)>1980 can be removed from the query, since it completelymatches all the files in the set of files to scan, i.e., FILE2.

Note that for each predicate/file combination, it can be determined thata file can match a predicate with the following results:

“nothing”—we know for sure no records in the file match the predicate(e.g. “birthday<1950” for all files)

“partially”—we know that some records in the file might match thepredicate

“completely”—we know that all records in the file match the predicate(e.g. “birthday>1950” for all files).

In an implementation, for every portion of data (such as a file)metadata may be tracked for the following types of metadata: min/maxvalues, number of values, number of NULL values, and additionaltype-specific information available in the metadata.

In an implementation, (as illustrated in FIG. 7) files containing stringdata, the length of the strings may be tracked, in addition to the rangeof characters within the strings. For example, in particular, if thereare non-ASCII characters it may be desirable to be aware that ASCIIreliant predicates should ignore the corresponding files. For example,with a predicate “WHERE name LIKE ‘%ß%’” (note that “ß” is a non-ASCIIcharacter) one can determine that a FILE1 and FILE3 can be eliminated asthey only have ASCII characters. In the example of FIGS. 2A-2C, FILE2 ofFIG. 2B, has non-ASCII characters in the name, and hence name_ascii isset to “no.”

It will be appreciated that this can be applied also to complexexpression and predicates. For all expressions (including functions) themethod can propagate the metadata through the query tree. In the exampleof FIGS. 2A-2C, if it is known that the “birthdate” column has a range[1975-12-02 . . . 1983-03-08], then it follows that a function“YEAR(birthdate)” has a range [1975 . . . 1983]. So that in a query“WHERE YEAR(birthday)>1980” FILE3 can be eliminated. Similarly,arbitrary Boolean combinations of predicates can be used, e.g., with afilter “WHERE YEAR(birthday)>1980 AND name IS NULL’, both FILE2 andFILE3 can be eliminated.

In an implementation, suppose a query based on the example files inFIGS. 2A-2C has the following predicate:

WHERE YEAR(birthday)>1980

AND LOWER(SUBSTR(name, 1, 3))=‘dav’

Note that the metadata does not have any direct information about YEARor lowercase values of the first two letters of the name. However, it ispossible to determine this data using function-specific value rangepropagation.

For example: logic specific to function YEAR can determine thatYEAR(birthday) for files is in the following ranges:

FILE1: 1975 . . . 1983 FILE2: 1983 . . . 1986 FILE3: 1971 . . . 1979

Based on that, logic specific to “greater than” function (“>”) candetermine, that the result of comparison for “WHERE YEAR(birthday)>1980”for the files are as follows:FILE1: partiallyFILE2: completelyFILE3: nothingSimilarly, logic specific to functions LOWER and SUBSTR can determinethat the value of LOWER(SUBSTR(name, 1, 3)) for files are as follows:FILE1: “and” . . . “joh”FILE2: “joh” . . . “thi”FILE3: “cla” . . . “mat”Again, logic specific to equality function determines, that the resultof LOWER(SUBSTR(name, 1, 3))=‘day’ for files is as follows:FILE1: partiallyFILE2: nothingFILE3: partiallyFinally, logic specific to function AND which receives results of bothpredicates for each file, can determine that the result of the entirepredicate for the files is as follows:FILE1: partiallyFILE2: nothingFILE3: nothing

Based on the above, it is known that only FILE1 partially matches thepredicates, i.e., has records that possibly match the predicate, andneeds to be scanned.

Further, in the above example, using the predicate YEAR(birthday)=1982,then after the predicate YEAR(birthday)=1982 has been computed, it isknown that FILE3 already does not match this predicate. As a result,there is no need to compute the second predicate, AND LOWER(SUBSTR(name,1, 3))=‘day’, for FILE3.

In an implementation for DELETE queries, the method may additionallyidentify files where it is known that ALL tuples match the deletepredicate, allowing very quick deletion of these files without having toanalyze the data within them.

Further in the example files, if the user issues a query DELETE FROMpersons WHERE birthdate>=‘1980-01-01’ it follows that the system mayaccept all records from FILE2 immediately, while FILE1 needs to beanalyzed record by record. Additionally, it follows that FILE3 doesn'tneed to be analyzed at all because it doesn't have any records possiblymatching, but that is derived from the metadata as discussed above.

Accordingly, a revised or modified query may be generated duringcompilation, such that the revised or modified query can be used inadditional iterations. The result may be an increase in efficiency asmore predicates or sets of files are eliminated from processing.

In an implementation for JOIN queries, the system can use the foundranges of data on one side of the expression to convert into filters onthe other side to further reduce/optimize operational procedures. Forexample, two tables may be:

ORDERS(order_id, order_date)

LINEITEMS(order_id, item_name, price)

In the same example, a query may be expressed as:

SELECT SUM(price) FROM orders, lineitems

WHERE lineitem.order_id=orders.order_id

and order_date>=‘2014-01-01’

One skilled in the art may assume there is usually a correlation betweenorder_id and order_date fields, after applying file pruning to theorders table (by exploiting metadata on order_date) it can be determinedthat the range of order_id values in the ORDERS table (e.g. assumingit's between example values 183198 and 218390). Accordingly, now thisderived range can be applied as an extra selection on the LINEITEMStable, effectively converting the query to:

SELECT SUM(price) FROM orders, lineitems

WHERE lineitem.order_id=orders.order_id

and order_date>=‘2014-01-01’

and lineitem.order_id BETWEEN 183198 AND 218390

This potentially dramatically reduces the number of accessed files andthe records in LINEITEMS, by pruning based on metadata (as discussedabove).

It should be noted, that there are similar techniques performed atruntime, and after the ORDERS table is scanned during the joinprocessing (assuming it's scanned first). Thus it should be noted thatthe solution is performed during compilation-time, and that it may bepurely metadata-based.

In some implementations, the metadata may be used to determine theoptimal physical types, eliminate predicates, simplify expressions, usedirect addressing in hash tables etc.

FIG. 4 illustrates a block diagram depicting an embodiment of resourcemanager 102. As shown in FIG. 4, resource manager 102 includes an accessmanager 402 and a key manager 404 coupled to a data storage device 406.Access manager 402 handles authentication and authorization tasks forthe systems described herein. Key manager 404 manages storage andauthentication of keys used during authentication and authorizationtasks. A request processing service 408 manages received data storagerequests and data retrieval requests. A management console service 410supports access to various systems and processes by administrators andother system managers.

Resource manager 102 also includes an SQL compiler 412, an SQL optimizer414 and an SQL executor 416. SQL compiler 412 parses SQL queries andgenerates the execution code for the queries. SQL optimizer 414determines the best method to execute queries based on the data thatneeds to be processed. SQL executor 416 executes the query code forqueries received by resource manager 102. A query scheduler andcoordinator 418 sends received queries to the appropriate services orsystems for compilation, optimization, and dispatch to executionplatform 112. A virtual warehouse manager 420 manages the operation ofmultiple virtual warehouses implemented in execution platform 112.

Additionally, resource manager 102 includes a configuration and metadatamanager 422, which manages the information related to the data stored inthe remote data storage devices and in the local caches. A monitor andworkload analyzer 424 oversees the processes performed by resourcemanager 102 and manages the distribution of tasks (e.g., workload)across the virtual warehouses and execution nodes in execution platform112. Configuration and metadata manager 422 and monitor and workloadanalyzer 424 are coupled to a data storage device 426.

Resource manager 102 also includes a transaction management and accesscontrol module 428, which manages the various tasks and other activitiesassociated with the processing of data storage requests and data accessrequests. For example, transaction management and access control module428 provides consistent and synchronized access to data by multipleusers or systems. Since multiple users/systems may access the same datasimultaneously, changes to the data must be synchronized to ensure thateach user/system is working with the current version of the data.Transaction management and access control module 428 provides control ofvarious data processing activities at a single, centralized location inresource manager 102.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram depicting an embodiment of an executionplatform 112. As shown in FIG. 5, execution platform 112 includesmultiple virtual warehouses 502, 504, and 506. Each virtual warehouseincludes multiple execution nodes that each include a cache and aprocessor. Although each virtual warehouse 502-506 shown in FIG. 5includes three execution nodes, a particular virtual warehouse mayinclude any number of execution nodes. Further, the number of executionnodes in a virtual warehouse is dynamic, such that new execution nodesare created when additional demand is present, and existing executionnodes are deleted when they are no longer necessary.

Each virtual warehouse 502-506 is capable of accessing any of the datastorage devices 116-120 shown in FIG. 1. Thus, virtual warehouses502-506 are not necessarily assigned to a specific data storage device116-120 and, instead, can access data from any of the data storagedevices 116-120. Similarly, each of the execution nodes shown in FIG. 5can access data from any of the data storage devices 116-120. In someembodiments, a particular virtual warehouse or a particular executionnode may be temporarily assigned to a specific data storage device, butthe virtual warehouse or execution node may later access data from anyother data storage device.

In the example of FIG. 5, virtual warehouse 502 includes three executionnodes 508, 510, and 512. Execution node 508 includes a cache 514 and aprocessor 516. Execution node 510 includes a cache 518 and a processor520. Execution node 512 includes a cache 522 and a processor 524. Eachexecution node 508-512 is associated with processing one or more datastorage and/or data retrieval tasks. For example, a particular virtualwarehouse may handle data storage and data retrieval tasks associatedwith a particular user or customer. In other implementations, aparticular virtual warehouse may handle data storage and data retrievaltasks associated with a particular data storage system or a particularcategory of data.

Similar to virtual warehouse 502 discussed above, virtual warehouse 504includes three execution nodes 526, 528, and 530. Execution node 526includes a cache 532 and a processor 534. Execution node 528 includes acache 536 and a processor 538. Execution node 530 includes a cache 540and a processor 542. Additionally, virtual warehouse 506 includes threeexecution nodes 544, 546, and 548. Execution node 544 includes a cache550 and a processor 552. Execution node 546 includes a cache 554 and aprocessor 556. Execution node 548 includes a cache 558 and a processor560.

Although the execution nodes shown in FIG. 5 each include one cache andone processor, alternate embodiments may include execution nodescontaining any number of processors and any number of caches.Additionally, the caches may vary in size among the different executionnodes. The caches shown in FIG. 5 store, in the local execution node,data that was retrieved from one or more data storage devices in storageplatform 114 (FIG. 1). Thus, the caches reduce or eliminate thebottleneck problems occurring in platforms that consistently retrievedata from remote storage systems. Instead of repeatedly accessing datafrom the remote storage devices, the systems and methods describedherein access data from the caches in the execution nodes which issignificantly faster and avoids the bottleneck problem discussed above.In some embodiments, the caches are implemented using high-speed memorydevices that provide fast access to the cached data. Each cache canstore data from any of the storage devices in storage platform 114.

Further, the cache resources and computing resources may vary betweendifferent execution nodes. For example, one execution node may containsignificant computing resources and minimal cache resources, making theexecution node useful for tasks that require significant computingresources. Another execution node may contain significant cacheresources and minimal computing resources, making this execution nodeuseful for tasks that require caching of large amounts of data. In someembodiments, the cache resources and computing resources associated witha particular execution node are determined when the execution node iscreated, based on the expected tasks to be performed by the executionnode.

Additionally, the cache resources and computing resources associatedwith a particular execution node may change over time based on changingtasks performed by the execution node. For example, a particularexecution node may be assigned more processing resources if the tasksperformed by the execution node become more processor intensive.Similarly, an execution node may be assigned more cache resources if thetasks performed by the execution node require a larger cache capacity.

Although virtual warehouses 502-506 are associated with the sameexecution platform 112, the virtual warehouses may be implemented usingmultiple computing systems at multiple geographic locations. Forexample, virtual warehouse 502 can be implemented by a computing systemat a first geographic location, while virtual warehouses 504 and 506 areimplemented by another computing system at a second geographic location.In some embodiments, these different computing systems are cloud-basedcomputing systems maintained by one or more different entities.

Additionally, each virtual warehouse is shown in FIG. 5 as havingmultiple execution nodes. The multiple execution nodes associated witheach virtual warehouse may be implemented using multiple computingsystems at multiple geographic locations. For example, a particularinstance of virtual warehouse 502 implements execution nodes 508 and 510on one computing platform at a particular geographic location, andimplements execution node 512 at a different computing platform atanother geographic location. Selecting particular computing systems toimplement an execution node may depend on various factors, such as thelevel of resources needed for a particular execution node (e.g.,processing resource requirements and cache requirements), the resourcesavailable at particular computing systems, communication capabilities ofnetworks within a geographic location or between geographic locations,and which computing systems are already implementing other executionnodes in the virtual warehouse. Execution platform 112 is also faulttolerant. For example, if one virtual warehouse fails, that virtualwarehouse is quickly replaced with a different virtual warehouse at adifferent geographic location.

A particular execution platform 112 may include any number of virtualwarehouses 502-506. Additionally, the number of virtual warehouses in aparticular execution platform is dynamic, such that new virtualwarehouses are created when additional processing and/or cachingresources are needed. Similarly, existing virtual warehouses may bedeleted when the resources associated with the virtual warehouse are nolonger necessary.

FIG. 6 illustrates a block diagram depicting another example operatingenvironment 600 having multiple distributed virtual warehouses andvirtual warehouse groups. Environment 600 includes resource manager 102that communicates with virtual warehouse groups 604 and 606 through adata communication network 602. Warehouse group 604 includes two virtualwarehouses 608 and 610, and warehouse group 606 includes another twovirtual warehouses 614 and 616. Resource manager 102 also communicateswith virtual warehouse 612 (which is not part of a virtual warehousegroup) through data communication network 602.

Virtual warehouse groups 604 and 606 as well as virtual warehouse 612communicate with databases 620, 622, and 624 through a datacommunication network 618. In some embodiments data communicationnetworks 602 and 618 are the same network. Environment 600 allowsresource manager 102 to coordinate user data storage and retrievalrequests across the multiple virtual warehouses 608-616 to store andretrieve data in databases 620-624. Virtual warehouse groups 604 and 606can be located in the same geographic area, or can be separatedgeographically. Additionally, virtual warehouse groups 604 and 606 canbe implemented by the same entity or by different entities.

The systems and methods described herein allow data to be stored andaccessed as a service that is separate from computing (or processing)resources. Even if no computing resources have been requested from theexecution platform, data is available to a virtual warehouse withoutrequiring reloading of the data from a remote data source. The describedsystems and methods are useful with any type of data. In particularembodiments, data is stored in a structured, optimized format. Thedecoupling of the data storage/access service from the computingservices also simplifies the sharing of data among different users andgroups. As discussed herein, each virtual warehouse can access any datato which it has access permissions, even at the same time as othervirtual warehouses are accessing the same data. This architecturesupports running queries without any actual data stored in the localcache. The systems and methods described herein are capable oftransparent dynamic data movement, which moves data from a remotestorage device to a local cache, as needed, in a manner that istransparent to the user of the system. Further, this architecturesupports data sharing without prior data movement since any virtualwarehouse can access any data due to the decoupling of the data storageservice from the computing service.

FIG. 7 is a flow diagram depicting an implementation of a method 700 formanaging data storage and retrieval operations. During use, method 700of FIG. 7 may receive a query directed to a set of files at 710, andwherein the query may comprise a plurality of predicates. In animplementation, each set of files may have corresponding metadatatherewith that may be accessed by a processor at 720.

At 731, representative values for each file within the set of files maybe derived from the metadata. At 733, the number of null values may bederived from the metadata for each file within the set of files. At 735,maximum and minimum values may be read or derived from the metadataassociated with each file in the set of files, thereby establishing arange of values that is representative of the data in the set of files.It will be appreciated that after performing the processes of 720, 731,733, and 735, a large amount of information is known about each filewithin the set of files without actually accessing any of the filesindividually.

At 737, metadata in the form of string data may be used to determine thelengths of the strings of data in the file, and at 739, the range ofcharacters of the strings may be identified. In an implementation,UNICODE-aware string operations are usually slower and more complex thanthose assuming ASCII-only data (7-bits) is represented in the files. Insuch a circumstance, if the values can be found to have pure ASCIIcharacters, (or also UNICODE characters), then such information may berecorded in the metadata for later use in optimization schemes asdiscussed above.

Accordingly, in an implementation, where only ASCII characters areassumed, much faster string operations can be used. In the previousexample of FIGS. 2A-2C, assume a query that computes the number ofpeople with a given first two letters of a name:

SELECT SUBSTR(name, 1, 2), COUNT(*) FROM persons

GROUP BY SUBSTR(name, 1, 2)

Note that the SUBSTR operation on records from FILE1 and FILE3 can use amuch faster implementation (assuming ASCII characters, where 1 byte is 1character), while for FILE2 a slower implementation is used which is onethat can handle Unicode.

In an implementing of a processing system that does not allow per-filechoice of SUBSTR logic, for this query:

SELECT SUBSTR(name, 1, 2), COUNT(*) FROM persons

GROUP BY SUBSTR(name, 1, 2)

WHERE birthdate<‘1980-01-01’

It is known that only FILE1 and FILE3 qualify, and they all have onlyASCII characters, and then a faster implementation can be used.

At 740, a plurality of predicates may be identified from the query andthen compared to the metadata associated with each of the files withinthe set of files.

At 750, the plurality of predicates may be compared to the metadatavalues and ranges. Specific, example of the differing types of metadatawill be discussed in greater detail below.

At 760, the metadata of the set of files may be compared to theplurality of predicates supplied with the query. As discussed below, ifthe predicates are not satisfied by the metadata, or fall within a rangedefined by the metadata, then the set of files can be ignored.Alternatively, if the predicates are satisfied by the metadata of allfiles, then the predicate may be deleted from the query at 770. Asillustrated in the FIG. 7, the method may loop back to 760 fordetermining if additional predicates may be deleted before a revisedquery is generated, or may advance to 780 and generate and new query thereflects the expected deletion. At 790, it may be determined as to whichfiles can be skipped for processing because of the revised query.

For example, if the metadata reveals that all values in a column “X” aregreater than 7, a filtering process “WHERE X>7” may be removed, therebysaving computing resources because the actual files need not beprocessed. Additionally, if it is known that there are no null values ina set of files, the filter “IS NOT NULL” may be removed, thereby savingresources. In another implementation, it may be known that the columnvalues are all within a range 0 . . . 1000, a 2-byte physicalrepresentation of that column may be used to simplify all theexpressions regarding data from that column.

In an implementation, for every portion of data (such as a file)metadata may be tracked for the following types of metadata: min/maxvalues, number of values, number of NULL values, and additionaltype-specific information available in the metadata.

In an implementation, (as illustrated in FIG. 7) files containing stringdata, the length of the strings may be tracked, in addition to the rangeof characters within the strings. For example, in particular, if thereare non-ASCII characters it may be desirable to be aware that ASCIIreliant predicates should ignore the corresponding files. In ourexample, FILE2 of FIG. 2B, has non-ASCII characters in name, and hencename_ascii is set to “no.”

This can be applied also to complex expression and predicates. For allexpressions (including functions) the method can propagate the metadatathrough the query tree. In our example, if it is known that the“birthdate” column has a range [1975-12-02 . . . 1983-03-08], then itfollows that a function “YEAR(birthdate)” has a range [1975 . . . 1983].So that in a query “WHERE YEAR(birthday)>1980” FILE3 can be eliminated.

In an implementation for DELETE queries, the method may additionallyidentify files where it is known that ALL tuples match the deletepredicate, allowing very quick deletion of these files without having toanalyze the data within them.

Further in the example files, if the user issues a query DELETE FROMpersons WHERE birthdate>=‘1980-01-01’ it follows that the system maydrop FILE2 immediately, while FILE1 needs to be analyzed record byrecord. Additionally, it follows that FILE3 doesn't need to be analyzedat all because it doesn't have any records possibly matching, but thatis derived from the metadata as discussed above.

Accordingly, a revised or modified query may be generated duringcompilation, at 780, such that the revised or modified query can be usedin additional iterations which results in increasing efficiency as morepredicates or the set of files are eliminated from processing. Forexample, a revised or modified query may be generated that omitspredicates that will not be found within the files to be queried,thereby conserving processing resources needed as the query is furtherexecuted.

FIG. 8 is a block diagram depicting an example computing device 800. Insome embodiments, computing device 800 is used to implement one or moreof the systems and components discussed herein. For example, computingdevice 800 may allow a user or administrator to access resource manager102. Further, computing device 800 may interact with any of the systemsand components described herein. Accordingly, computing device 800 maybe used to perform various procedures and tasks, such as those discussedherein. Computing device 800 can function as a server, a client or anyother computing entity. Computing device 800 can be any of a widevariety of computing devices, such as a desktop computer, a notebookcomputer, a server computer, a handheld computer, a tablet, and thelike.

Computing device 800 includes one or more processor(s) 802, one or morememory device(s) 804, one or more interface(s) 806, one or more massstorage device(s) 808, and one or more Input/Output (I/O) device(s) 810,all of which are coupled to a bus 812. Processor(s) 802 include one ormore processors or controllers that execute instructions stored inmemory device(s) 804 and/or mass storage device(s) 808. Processor(s) 802may also include various types of computer-readable media, such as cachememory.

Memory device(s) 804 include various computer-readable media, such asvolatile memory (e.g., random access memory (RAM)) and/or nonvolatilememory (e.g., read-only memory (ROM)). Memory device(s) 804 may alsoinclude rewritable ROM, such as Flash memory.

Mass storage device(s) 808 include various computer readable media, suchas magnetic tapes, magnetic disks, optical disks, solid state memory(e.g., Flash memory), and so forth. Various drives may also be includedin mass storage device(s) 808 to enable reading from and/or writing tothe various computer readable media. Mass storage device(s) 808 includeremovable media and/or non-removable media.

I/O device(s) 810 include various devices that allow data and/or otherinformation to be input to or retrieved from computing device 800.Example I/O device(s) 810 include cursor control devices, keyboards,keypads, microphones, monitors or other display devices, speakers,printers, network interface cards, modems, lenses, CCDs or other imagecapture devices, and the like.

Interface(s) 806 include various interfaces that allow computing device800 to interact with other systems, devices, or computing environments.Example interface(s) 806 include any number of different networkinterfaces, such as interfaces to local area networks (LANs), wide areanetworks (WANs), wireless networks, and the Internet.

Bus 812 allows processor(s) 802, memory device(s) 804, interface(s) 806,mass storage device(s) 808, and I/O device(s) 810 to communicate withone another, as well as other devices or components coupled to bus 812.Bus 812 represents one or more of several types of bus structures, suchas a system bus, PCI bus, IEEE 1394 bus, USB bus, and so forth.

For purposes of illustration, programs and other executable programcomponents are shown herein as discrete blocks, although it isunderstood that such programs and components may reside at various timesin different storage components of computing device 800, and areexecuted by processor(s) 802. Alternatively, the systems and proceduresdescribed herein can be implemented in hardware, or a combination ofhardware, software, and/or firmware. For example, one or moreapplication specific integrated circuits (ASICs) can be programmed tocarry out one or more of the systems and procedures described herein.Accordingly, as used herein the term “module” is intended to representcomputer hardware, firmware, and software, alone or in combination, forthe purposes of performing all or parts of query operations.

Although the present disclosure is described in terms of certainpreferred embodiments, other embodiments will be apparent to those ofordinary skill in the art, given the benefit of this disclosure,including embodiments that do not provide all of the benefits andfeatures set forth herein, which are also within the scope of thisdisclosure. It is to be understood that other embodiments may beutilized, without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.

What is claimed is:
 1. A system comprising: a metadata store to storemetadata; and a processor, operatively coupled with the metadata store,to: determine whether each of a plurality of predicates included in aquery partially matches at least one of a plurality of files using themetadata stored in the metadata store; for each predicate in theplurality of predicates that does not partially match at least one ofthe plurality of files, remove that predicate from the plurality ofpredicates to create a reduced set of predicates; modify the query touse the reduced set of predicates; and process the modified query usingthe reduced set of predicates and the plurality of files.
 2. The systemof claim 1, wherein the reduced set of predicates has a second number ofpredicates that is smaller than a first number of predicates in theplurality of predicates.
 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the processorfurther to: receive the query with the plurality of predicates and thequery to be applied to a plurality of files that comprise database data.4. The system of claim 1, wherein the processor further to: generate ametadata file comprising information about a discrete selection ofdatabase data stored in a file; and store the metadata file in themetadata store separate from the discrete selection of the databasedata.
 5. The system of claim 1, wherein to partially match at least oneof a plurality of files, the processor to: determine, based on themetadata, a range of values of database data stored in a certain file;and determine whether any data within the range of values of databasedata stored in the certain file matches at least one of the plurality ofpredicates.
 6. The system of claim 5, wherein to determine whether anydata within the range of values of database data, the processor todetermine that a certain file matches at least one of the plurality ofpredicates based on at least a determination that some data within therange of values stored in the certain file matches at least one of theplurality of predicates.
 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the processorfurther to identify at least one applicable column within each of theplurality of files that comprises database data partially matching atleast one of the plurality of predicates.
 8. The system of claim 1,wherein the processor further to receive a query comprising a pluralityof predicates and each of the plurality of predicates is a conditionexpression that evaluates to a Boolean value.
 9. The system of claim 1,wherein the metadata store is separate from the database data andwherein the processor further to prune another inapplicable predicatefrom the plurality of predicates that matches all of the plurality offiles by removing that inapplicable predicate from the query.
 10. Thesystem of claim 1, wherein the metadata for one of the plurality offiles includes at least one of a minimum value, a maximum value, anumber of values, and a number of null values.
 11. A method comprising:determining, by a processor, whether each of a plurality of predicatesincluded in a query partially matches at least one of a plurality offiles using metadata stored in a metadata store; for each predicate inthe plurality of predicates that does not partially match at least oneof the plurality of files, removing that predicate from the plurality ofpredicates; modifying the query to use the reduced set of predicates;and processing the modified query using the reduced set of predicatesand the plurality of files.
 12. The method of claim 11, wherein thereduced set of predicates has a second number of predicates that issmaller than a first number of predicates in the plurality ofpredicates.
 13. The method of claim 11, further comprising receiving thequery with the plurality of predicates and the query to be applied to aplurality of files that comprise database data.
 14. The method of claim11, further comprising: generating a metadata file comprisinginformation about a discrete selection of database data stored in afile; and storing the metadata file in the metadata store separate fromthe discrete selection of the database data.
 15. The method of claim 11,wherein the partially match at least one of a plurality of filescomprises: determining, based on the metadata, a range of values ofdatabase data stored in a certain file; and determining whether any datawithin the range of values of database data stored in the certain filesatisfies at least one of the plurality of predicates.
 16. The method ofclaim 15, wherein to determine whether any data within the range ofvalues of database data comprises identifying the certain file as beingan applicable file in response to a determination that some data withinthe range of values stored in the certain file matches at least one ofthe plurality of predicates
 17. The method of claim 11, furthercomprising identifying at least one applicable column within each of theplurality of files that comprises database data partially matching atleast one of the plurality of predicates.
 18. The method of claim 11,wherein the processor further to receive a query comprising a pluralityof predicates and each of the plurality of predicates is a conditionexpression that evaluates to a Boolean value.
 19. The method of claim11, wherein the metadata store is separate from the database data andwherein the processor further to prune another inapplicable predicatefrom the plurality of predicates that matches all of the plurality offiles by removing that inapplicable predicate from the query.
 20. Themethod of claim 11, wherein the metadata for one of the plurality offiles includes at least one of a minimum value, a maximum value, anumber of values, and a number of null values.
 21. A non-transitorycomputer readable storage media, programmable to execute instructionsthat, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to: determinewhether each of a plurality of predicates included in a query partiallymatches at least one of a plurality of files using metadata stored in ametadata store; for each predicate in the plurality of predicates thatdoes not partially match at least one of the plurality of files, removethat predicate from the plurality of predicates to create a reduced setof predicates; modify the query to use the reduced set of predicates;and process the modified query using the reduced set of predicates andthe plurality of files.
 22. The non-transitory computer readable storagemedia of claim 21, wherein the reduced set of predicates has a secondnumber of predicates that is smaller than a first number of predicates.23. The non-transitory computer readable storage media of claim 21, theinstructions further to cause the processor to receive the query withthe plurality of predicates and the query to be applied to a pluralityof files that comprise database data.
 24. The non-transitory computerreadable storage media of claim 21, wherein to read the metadata, theprocessor to: generate a metadata file comprising information about adiscrete selection of database data stored in a file; and store themetadata file in the metadata store separate from the discrete selectionof the database data.
 25. The non-transitory computer readable storagemedia of claim 21, wherein to read the metadata, the processor to:determine, based on the metadata, a range of values of database datastored in a certain file; and determine whether any data within therange of values of database data stored in the certain file satisfies atleast one of the plurality of predicates.
 26. The non-transitorycomputer readable storage media of claim 25, wherein to determinewhether any data within the range of values of database data comprisesdetermine that a certain file satisfies at least one of the plurality ofpredicates based on at least a determination that some data within therange of values stored in the certain file satisfies at least one of theplurality of predicates.
 27. The non-transitory computer readablestorage media of claim 21, the instructions further to cause theprocessor to identify at least one applicable column within each of theplurality of files that comprises database data partially matching atleast one of the plurality of predicates.
 28. The non-transitorycomputer readable storage media of claim 21, wherein the processorfurther to receive a query comprising a plurality of predicates and eachof the plurality of predicates is a condition expression that evaluatesto a Boolean value.
 29. The non-transitory computer readable storagemedia of claim 21, wherein the metadata store is separate from thedatabase data and wherein the processor further to prune anotherinapplicable predicate from the plurality of predicates that matches allof the plurality of files by removing that inapplicable predicate fromthe query.
 30. The non-transitory computer readable storage media ofclaim 21, wherein the metadata for one of the plurality of filesincludes at least one of a minimum value, a maximum value, a number ofvalues, and a number of null values.